Playback speed
×
Share post
Share post at current time
0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

Mike Adams Interviews Germar Rudolf

Via https://www.brighteon.com/0b8f824b-c066-4419-bb9f-41b72b958af0

For some odd reason as I listen to Germar’s story, Gandalf’s words to Frodo come to mind:

“Then I heard Bilbo’s strange story of how he had “won it”, and I could not believe it. When I at last got the truth out of him, I saw at once that he had been trying to put his claim to the ring beyond doubt. Much like Gollum with his “birthday present.” The lies were too much alike for my comfort.”

But I’m not referring to Germar, and his testimony. 🤔 I’m referring to The Official Narrative of a certain purported event in Europe, now nearly a century ago. 🙄

Lying Shittypedia has this to say about him:

Meanwhile the actual calibre of Lying Shittypedia’s credibility/objectivity is exemplified with this concluding chestnut:

He was actually wearing a rather skimpy pair of shorts, none-the-less was convicted… The York Daily Record provides the usual biased account.. My question being, who goes running at 4 o’clock in the morning wearing a yellow t-shirt and sneakers… and nothing else? 🙄 Possibly his undeserved vilified reputation may have had something to do with the guilty verdict and sentencing? Just saying... 🤔

Despite the fact it takes maybe 90 minutes to 2 hour’s casual on-line reading to blow The Official Holocaust Narrative to smithereens — it is that flimsy and preposterous — to take such a position in Canada, as in 19 other countries, is to risk a 2-year-prison sentence. Reportedly in some of these countries it is illegal, even to research “The Holocaust.” Moreover I’ve gathered if you’re accused of same in Canada at least (I’ll gladly stand corrected if possible) any supporting evidence you may care to present in your defense to the court is automatically deemed inadmissible. Thus simply for stating “I don’t believe this” you are a criminal, you are some kind of half-psychotic, monumental bigot; at the very least you risk instantly alienating most people you speak to.

All of this however does seem rather an extreme response to an admittedly unpopular perspective. 🤔 And so of course, I won’t admit to it. The Inner Party has dictated 2 + 2 = 5 and so of course, it is.

Coincidentally enough in other news I learned yesterday via Substack that... Ursula Haverbeck is no more. She has ceased, to be. Her metabolic processes are now history. She’s snuffed it, bit the dust, shuffled off her mortal coil, rung down the curtain and joined the bleeding choir invisible. She’s a stiff. Bereft of life, she rests in peace. She is an ex-“Holocaust Denier” and putative Neonazi... 😥

She was 96. History didn’t relate if she died in prison for speaking her truth, though I suspect this may be the case.

What kind of society imprisons old women in their 80s and 90s simply for holding unpalatable opinions? 😱

Eternal Rest grant unto her O Lord, and may Light Perpetual shine upon her. May she rest in peace.